![[Exclu] Amandine Pellissard attaquée en justice par l’ancien parrain de sa fille : il sort du silence](https://solemates219.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Amandine-Pellissard-sued-by-daughters-former-godfather-he-finally-breaks.webp-1200x678.webp)
Show summary Hide summary
Amandine Pellissard defamation case: Vincenzo Caserta wins court ruling
Old friends now at odds, a high-profile social media feud between influencer Amandine Pellissard and perfumer Vincenzo Caserta has spilled into the courts. Caserta says he sued for defamation after public accusations on social channels and secured a judgment in his favor; the dispute over a product partnership, money and reputation continues.
how the friendship and business relationship began
Hilary Swank’s husband Philip Schneider: inside the businessman behind the star
Polska pregnant and betrayed by a close friend: she is very, very shocked
The relationship started when Caserta reached out to Pellissard during a turbulent moment in her public life. He, a creator of bespoke fragrances and an olfactotherapist, says he was moved by her situation and met her shortly before her daughter’s premature birth. Their connection turned personal: she asked him to be the godfather to her newborn, a role he accepted.
That personal bond quickly moved into business. Caserta offered to produce and market products tied to Pellissard’s name. He frames the arrangement as a manufacturer-influencer partnership rather than a standard sponsorship.
the partnership terms and what went wrong
Caserta describes a clear commercial plan and contract. He says he advanced initial costs and proposed a profit split once sales covered taxes and expenses.
- manufacturer covers upfront costs
- VAT handled by seller and deducted from revenue
- profits split 50/50 between influencer and manufacturer
- influencer retains oversight of promotion
Products launched in late September 2023 and, according to Caserta, performed well at first. But by December, Pellissard reportedly paused promotions. Caserta says that sudden drop in visibility caused sales to plummet, triggering tensions over accounting and amounts due.
dispute over accounting and VAT
The financial disagreement centered on how VAT was being treated in profit calculations. Caserta explains that VAT is paid and remitted, and cannot be counted as profit. He says Pellissard interpreted the sales reports differently and claimed he owed her thousands.
That argument escalated into public accusations when tensions spilled onto social media.
legal battle and the court’s decision
In February 2024, Pellissard posted serious allegations about Caserta online. He responded by filing a defamation complaint and taking legal steps that led to a hearing. On July 9, 2024, the court ruled in Caserta’s favor.
The judge found that the contested social media statements lacked supporting evidence and could harm Caserta’s reputation. The ruling required Pellissard to pay damages and to publish a judicial notice acknowledging the court’s finding.
- judgment date: July 9, 2024
- outcome: ruling in favor of Vincenzo Caserta
- orders: damages awarded and publication of a court notice
Caserta says bailiffs recovered the monetary penalty, but the required public notice has not been posted. He warns that failure to comply will prompt new legal action to enforce the court order.
ongoing conflict and public accusations
Despite the court decision, the dispute continues on social platforms. Pellissard has again made claims accusing Caserta of harassment and other wrongdoing. Caserta firmly denies these allegations and insists some posts include false claims about how his products are sourced.
He says bailiffs have documented false statements in her stories and that he expects to use legal avenues to stop the continued accusations.
Caserta’s response and next moves
Caserta maintains he prefers discretion but will act if he is targeted. He requests that Pellissard produce lawful proof for any claim she makes, including assertions about product origin or alleged harassment. He warns that continued public accusations could trigger additional lawsuits.
He stresses he is not seeking conflict for its own sake but vows to defend his reputation and professional work by all legal means if necessary.
the reputational stakes and public reaction
This case highlights how influencer-brand ties can fracture and become legal disputes when expectations differ. It also shows the risks of airing commercial conflicts on social media, where statements can quickly reach a wide audience and become subject to defamation law.
Observers following both sides note the personal history between the two adds emotional intensity to what began as a business disagreement. Caserta has urged restraint and legal proof; Pellissard continues to post about the matter, keeping the story active online.
